Limitations imposed by the Law Society on Marketing Legal Services

Table of Contents

On February 23, 2017, the Law Society of Ontario (“LSO”) introduced amendments to advertising rules that govern legal practitioners in Ontario.[1] The new rules were implemented as a result of law firms’ rapidly increasing marketing efforts, particularly in the world of personal injury advertising, coupled with an equal increase in complaints that the Law Society received. In 2015, the Law Society handled a total of 141 complaints of law firms’ advertising practices.

Malcolm Mercer, chair of the Law Society’s Advertising and Fee Arrangements Issues Working Group said that the LSO’s new advertising rules focus on ensuring that lawyers market only “demonstrably true, accurate and verifiable” legal services, thereby preventing potential clients from becoming misled, confused or deceived[2]. The Working Group conducted market research that identified several areas of concern with regards to lawyers’ marketing practices.

The amended rules address these concerns by:

  • Requiring lawyers to identify in their advertising whether they are a licensed lawyer or paralegal[3];
  • Prohibiting lawyers to advertise for work that they do not intend to or are not licensed to do[4];
  • Prohibiting lawyers from using language such as “best”, “super” and “#1” in advertising[5];
  • Limiting the types of awards and honours that lawyers are permitted to use in advertising, as some awards are purchased, as opposed to received by evaluation of performance[6]; and
  • Avoiding second service opinion marketing, which entails disclosing the practice of referring clients to other firms in exchange for a fee[7].

Lawyers who violate the Rules of Professional Conduct will be subject to appropriate regulatory action, as to maintain a high standard of professionalism and foster public confidence in the legal profession.

Time will tell as to whether the Law Society’s efforts will have any effect on advertising practices within the legal profession.

 

[1] Law Society of Ontario, Rules of Professional Conduct (June 22, 2000, amendments current to September 28, 2017), s. 4.2-1, online: https://www.lsuc.on.ca/lawyer-conduct-rules/ [“LSO Rules”].

[2] Law Society of Ontario Gazette Newsletter, “Law Society strengthens advertising rules in the public interest”,February 23, 2017.

[3] LSO Rules, supra note 1, s.4.2-1.1.

[4] LSO Rules, supra note 1 at the commentary to s. 4.2-1.

[5] Ibid.

[6] Ibid.

[7] Ibid.

AUTHOR

america analysis business 926987

MORE ARTICLES

NMLS, TILA, RESPA, DSCR… What Do They Mean? A Canadian Private Lender’s Guide to Speaking American

One of the biggest surprises Canadian private lenders encounter when expanding into the United States isn't the legal system, it’s

READ ARTICLE →

Judicial vs. Non-Judicial Foreclosure: What Canadian Lenders Need to Know About the U.S. System

For Canadian private lenders looking to expand into the United States, one of the biggest surprises is often the foreclosure

READ ARTICLE →

How Long Does It Take for a Canadian Private Lender to Expand into the United States?

One of the first questions Canadian private lenders ask me is surprisingly simple: "Okay, Jasmine. If we decide we want

READ ARTICLE →

How Canadian Mortgage Brokers Can Legally Fund U.S. Business-Purpose Loans

For decades, Canadian mortgage brokers have built successful businesses helping clients navigate an increasingly competitive lending landscape. But as more

READ ARTICLE →

Canadian Capital vs. American Capital: Can Canadian Private Lenders Raise Money From Both to Fund U.S. Deals?

One of the most common misconceptions I hear from Canadian private lenders looking to expand into the United States is

READ ARTICLE →