Case Commentary – Rule 49 Costs Awarded Against Insurer

Table of Contents

Last week, we explained how offers to settle under Rule 49 of the Rules of Civil Procedure could have serious costs consequences if a claim went to trial. In this decision, the insurance company Aviva was ordered to pay over $235,000 in substantial indemnity costs to the plaintiff, after failing to beat the plaintiff\’s most recent Rule 49 offer to settle.

Persampieri v. Hobbs

This case involved an elderly woman that was injured in a car accident. She began a legal claim against the other driver, who was insured by Aviva. Aviva took the position that the plaintiff was not entitled to any damages, and refused to discuss any settlement offers higher than $0.00. Aviva rejected two offers to settle made by the plaintiff pursuant to Rule 49 before the matter went to trial, with the last one being for $10,000.

The Rule 49 offer and costs at trial

At trial, the plaintiff was successful, and was awarded approximately $20,000 in damages, or $10,000 more than her last Rule 49 offer. This meant that she was entitled to costs on a substantial indemnity basis from the date of her last offer, through the end of the trial. However, as discussed in our last post, the court retains discretion to determine how much should be awarded in costs.

Aviva argued that the plaintiff did not win a lot of money, and regardless of her Rule 49 offer, the costs awarded should be proportionate to her $20,000 damages. The plaintiff disagreed, and asked the court for her reasonably incurred costs.

Although proportionality to a damages award is one consideration for the court in assessing costs, this was not relevant here. The court found that Aviva, as a sophisticated insurer, had made a strategic decision to reject any offer the plaintiff made, knowing full well that this could result in a modest offer being refused, and a costly trial for a correspondingly modest award. The court would not sanction such behaviour, as it would discourage plaintiffs from bringing such modest claims in similar circumstances, and accordingly awarded $237,017.50 to the plaintiff.

Personal injury lawyers helping accident victims fighting for compensation

At Jasmine Daya & Co., we are dedicated to helping seriously injured accident victims get full and fair compensation for their losses. We have over four decades of experience helping clients fight against insurance companies, and helping them make strategically sound decisions about their claim.

If you have questions about a potential claim, contact us online, or by calling our office at 416-967-9100. We offer free consultations to new clients.

AUTHOR

rule 49

MORE ARTICLES

NMLS, TILA, RESPA, DSCR… What Do They Mean? A Canadian Private Lender’s Guide to Speaking American

One of the biggest surprises Canadian private lenders encounter when expanding into the United States isn't the legal system, it’s

READ ARTICLE →

Judicial vs. Non-Judicial Foreclosure: What Canadian Lenders Need to Know About the U.S. System

For Canadian private lenders looking to expand into the United States, one of the biggest surprises is often the foreclosure

READ ARTICLE →

How Long Does It Take for a Canadian Private Lender to Expand into the United States?

One of the first questions Canadian private lenders ask me is surprisingly simple: "Okay, Jasmine. If we decide we want

READ ARTICLE →

How Canadian Mortgage Brokers Can Legally Fund U.S. Business-Purpose Loans

For decades, Canadian mortgage brokers have built successful businesses helping clients navigate an increasingly competitive lending landscape. But as more

READ ARTICLE →

Canadian Capital vs. American Capital: Can Canadian Private Lenders Raise Money From Both to Fund U.S. Deals?

One of the most common misconceptions I hear from Canadian private lenders looking to expand into the United States is

READ ARTICLE →